@article{oai:nayoro.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000676, author = {Mizue,FUJII and Taiko,TERASHIMA and Masako,IKEDA and Kimiko,IINO and 藤井, 瑞恵 and 寺島, 泰子 and 池田, 正子 and 飯野, 君子}, journal = {市立名寄短期大学紀要, Bulletin of Nayoro City College}, month = {Jun}, note = {110007156464, 北海道内の看護師教育機関の教員167名と卒業生を受け入れている病院の看護師長171名に、学生の卒業時に期待する看護技術の到達度について質問紙調査を行った。卒業時に期待する技術到達度は多くの項目で教員の方が看護師長よりも高く評定していた。食事、清潔、ベッドメーキング、体位変換、安全、フィジカルアセスメントの技術でその傾向が著名であった。看護師長が高く評定していたのは、注射に関する項目であった。卒業時に期待する到達度が比較的高くない30項目について因子分析を行ったところ、教員は5因子、看護師長は6因子が抽出された。教員は技術項目を教科書の分類にそってとらえていた。看護師長は専門性の高い技術と、必要に応じて看護専門職以外の人に移譲できる技術とを区別してとらえていた。看護師長のとらえ方も視野に入れて、より効果的な看護技術経験の機会の設定を検討する必要がある。, Questionnaires were given to a group of 167 instructors from institutions ou nursing education and a group of 171 chiefs of nursing at hospitals that accept new graduates in Hokkaido. The questionnaires concerned the level of technical nursing skills that can be expected of a nursing student at graduation time. For many of the items in the questinnaire,instructors gave higher evaluations than nursing heads at hospitals concerning the level of technical achievement at graduation time. That tendency was particularly apparent for items inovolving nutrition,hygine,bed making,moving the patient in bed and positioning,safety,and physical assessment. The category where nursing chiefs gave higher evaluations concerned injections.Factor analysis was conducted for 30 items that had particularly low evaluations.As a result, five factors for instructors, and six factors for chiefs were identified. Instructors' evaluations of technical items followed textbook categories. Nursing chiefs, on the other hand,performed evaluations that made distinctions between highly technical skills and those skills that can be transferred to people not of the nursing specialty. It is necessary to consider the evaluations of nursing chiefs and examine ways to design opportunities for nursing students to gain more effective technical experience.}, pages = {95--101}, title = {看護学生の卒業時技術到達度 : 学生が臨地実習で経験できる技術の内容と回数を増やす可能性の検討}, volume = {38}, year = {2005}, yomi = {フジイ, ミズエ and テラシマ, ヤスコ and イイノ, キミコ} }